WRAL and Data Center Knowledge confirm North Carolina lawmakers have moved HB 1004, the Ratepayer and Resource Protection Act, into the 2025-2026 General Assembly. Filed April 27, 2026. Threshold: facilities with peak electricity demand of ≥40 MW (~32,000-home equivalent) or annual water use >1 billion liters. Three substantive mandates: cost-based electric rates with full pass-through of infrastructure expansion costs; minimum 25% on-site generation share using clean energy; categorical bar on local-government tax incentives and subsidies for any covered facility. The bill is in early-stage committee referral — not yet voted out of committee. Sponsor framing emphasizes addressing 'cost-shifting from large data centers onto households and small businesses, as AI-driven demand accelerates power and water consumption across the state.' DCD coverage notes the bill goes substantially further than VA's HB 1393 (cost allocation only) and TX's SB 6 (interconnection standards only) by directly mandating an on-site generation share — the first such mandate in any US state-level data-center legislation.
Primary source · Data Center Knowledge ↗
Why it matters
This is a structurally distinct legislative template from anything in the VA / TX / OH / VA cluster currently tracked in virginia-data-center-legislation-2026.md, ercot-puc-58317-sb6-implementation-workshop.md, or byog-byong-state-patchwork.md — and worth opening a dedicated north-carolina-hb-1004.md wiki page. Three load-bearing observations: (1) the 25% on-site clean-generation mandate is the first time a state has written the BTM share into statute. Until now, BTM share has been negotiated bilaterally between developer and utility (the Fleet Storey / Joule Utah / Hyperion Louisiana stack) or driven by ERCOT/PJM market design (the FERC ER26-1088 + ERCOT BYOG patchwork). HB 1004 codifies it as a precondition of the load itself — that's a different legal posture entirely. If 'clean energy' is interpreted narrowly to exclude natural gas (the bill text is not yet final on that question), it eliminates the transitional-BTM template that Fleet just deployed in Nevada and forces solar / battery / SMR / fuel cell as the only viable on-site stack. The fuel-cell language in particular is the read-closely item — Bloom solid-oxide fuel cells running on natural gas may or may not qualify under NC's clean-energy framework, and that determination is the real product-relevant dial. (2) The ban on local tax incentives is the kill-shot for the negotiated-tax-abatement playbook running concurrently in Hermantown ($80M / 28-year, top section above), in Mount Pleasant WI (yesterday's news), and in the typical Henrico / Loudoun VA template. If NC HB 1004 passes, it forces hyperscalers in NC to compete on operating economics rather than tax arbitrage — a structural change to data-center site-selection economics that Cliff's de-rate calculator regulatory-risk module should treat as an entirely separate state-level risk axis. (3) NC is the canary because it has both the existing hyperscaler pipeline (Google, Apple, Meta in Lenoir / Maiden / Forest City clusters) AND the political composition (Democratic governor + Republican legislature) that historically passes consumer-protection bills. If HB 1004 clears committee in 2026, the template is highly portable to OH / GA / IN / SC. Specifically watch the next-30-day committee referral in the Senate Commerce or Public Utilities committee — that's where the on-site-generation share gets tested.
Tags
Related filings
Project Kilby / Microsoft + Chevron 2.67 GW behind-the-meter / Pecos TX Permian Basin / 20-yr PPA / $7B+ capex / FID YE 2026 / first power 2028 / OFF-grid (bypasses ERCOT)
Plain-English version of what Project Kilby is. Microsoft and Chevron jointly announced on June 22 that they are co-developing a roughly 2.67 gigawatt natural gas power plant in the Permian Basin near Pecos, Texas (about 200 miles east of El Paso), paired...
FL moratorium wave / Clay final + Hernando, Lake first reading Jun 23 / Santa Rosa 3-1 to draft / Zephyrhills final / 5-8 FL jurisdictions in 5 weeks / SB 484 backdrop / water-first concern
Plain-English version of what happened. Tuesday, June 23 was the single most active moratorium day Florida has had — three county boards moved separate ordinances forward in a coordinated wave. Clay County (just south of Jacksonville, ~220,000 residents) gave...
Abbott directive Jun 10 / PUCT + ERCOT memo due Jul 17 / residential transmission cost reduction by Jul 31 / data centers self-fund infrastructure / TX legislative agenda preview / context for Kilby
Plain-English version of what Abbott actually directed. On June 10, 2026 — twelve days before the Project Kilby announcement — Texas Gov. Greg Abbott sent a formal directive letter to the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT, the state utility regulator)...
Oracle sued Wisconsin PSC Jun 19 Ozaukee County / challenging April tariff rule / $100M/year financial security / very large customer >20 MW sub-A credit / Oracle BBB / Port Washington $15B 672 acres 1 GW 4 buildings We Energies / statutory-authority + discrimination + due-process theories / parallel administrative reconsideration / first hyperscaler-vs-PSC ratepayer-protection lawsuit / template for VA SCC MD FERC IL DCIP TX SB6 / AWS BBB+ adjacent risk / expected 6-12 months to ruling
Plain-English background on why this lawsuit matters more than a single facility dispute. Multiple states have enacted or are enacting 'ratepayer protection' rules for hyperscaler-scale customers in 2025-2026: Virginia's SCC rate class (approved Nov 2025,...