Plain-English framing: SB 6 is the Texas legislature's response to ERCOT receiving 225 new large-load interconnection requests in 2025 (vs. 152 total from 2022-2024) and tracking ~238.6 GW of large-load requests as of December 2025. The law says: any new load 75 MW or larger has to pay big non-refundable application fees, post substantial financial collateral, prove site control, and disclose related projects up front — the goal is to filter out speculative interconnection requests from real, financed projects. The PUCT's draft rule (16 TAC §25.194) is the implementing regulation that turns the statute into enforceable specifics: which fees, which collateral amounts, which disclosures, which timelines. The $50,000-$100,000 per MW non-refundable fee is the most economically significant number — for a 500 MW data center, that's $25M-$50M in non-refundable application costs just to start the interconnection process. The ERCOT Batch Zero PCLR framework (separate from SB 6) is the operational mechanism — the framework that lets a fast-track interconnection request access provisional load before all transmission upgrades are complete. Together, SB 6 financial gates + ERCOT Batch Zero fast track = the new Texas interconnection regime. Sources: Perkins Coie 'SB 6 Implementation Shaping Data Center Future in Texas'; Greenberg Traurig 'Texas Senate Bill 6 Update: What Data Centers and Large Load Customers Should Know About Proposed Interconnection Standards'; Bracewell 'Texas Senate Bill 6 Ushers in Major Overhaul of Large Load Interconnection and Grid Access Rules'; EPE Consulting 'New Pathway and Deadlines in ERCOT's Batch Zero: PCLR'; Seyfarth Shaw 'ERCOT's Batch Zero Proposal and What It Means for Large-Load Projects in Texas'.
Primary source · PUCT / Perkins Coie / Greenberg Traurig / Bracewell / EPE Consulting / Seyfarth Shaw ↗
Why it matters
Texas is the highest-velocity state for data center interconnection volume (238.6 GW in queue, 225 new requests in 2025), and SB 6 + the PUCT rule + ERCOT Batch Zero are the three layers that together define the cost and timeline of any new Texas data center. For Cliff's beachhead wedge — Layer 5 live-docket + interruptible-load — this is the central regulatory artifact and the single richest source of structured filing data in the next 12 months. PUCT's draft rule had a closed comment period (April 17), so the next inflection point is final rule adoption. Once final, every developer in the ERCOT queue has to comply, which generates a high volume of filings, financial security documents, and site control disclosures — all structured, all primary-source, all queryable. The non-refundable per-MW fee structure ($50,000-$100,000/MW) creates a clean economic discriminator: it filters speculative requests out of the queue, which means the surviving queue is much higher-quality information about real data center demand. Update strategy/ercot-pclr-batch-zero.md with the SB 6 rule status: comment period closed April 17, final rule pending, PUCT is the implementing regulator, and any Texas siting analysis post-rule-adoption needs an SB 6 financial-security column in addition to the existing ERCOT Batch Zero PCLR column.
Related filings
Exelon cuts high-probability DC load 18→11 GW -40% / pipeline 43→25 GW / ComEd cancels PowerHouse Hillwood 1.8 GW $20B TSA / EXC -3.1% / EIA TX 2027 14%→6% / outlier: FirstEnergy +50% AEP 63→69 GW Dominion 53.8 GW Southern 17 GW Camellia 3.2 GW with 1 GW flexible DR / BofA 230+ GW needed vs 93 GW planned / JLL 25 GW H1 absorption 1% vacancy 66 GW UC 95% pre-let / BNEF +52% 2030 118 GW +83% 2035 194 GW / $11.3M per MW +6% / 499k worker shortfall
On July 30 Exelon became the first major utility to mark its data center pipeline to market: 'high probability' load cut from 18 GW to 11 GW (-40%), total future pipeline from 43 GW to 25 GW, disclosed in the Q2 8-K alongside the state-policy squeeze (NJ...
Abbott Jul 24 joint-memo actions / pay own infrastructure / 3 legislative asks 2027 / Project 58000 4CP→12CP comments Aug 11 adoption by Dec 31 / ride-through Jul 13 / Docket 59220 Crusoe/Ensign 260 MW + 265.5 MW wind uncapped curtailment first §39.169 test / Amazon GW Ranch 7.65 GW Pecos County off-grid largest TX BTM / NRG 1.2 GW BYOP CCGT / Energy Vault 1.25 GW BESS+gensets
While the audit froze the front door, the rest of the Texas architecture kept assembling. Abbott's July 17 PUCT/ERCOT joint memo produced its public actions July 24: data centers pay for their own infrastructure, residential ratepayers get shielded from...
Batch Zero 326 projects 205 GW filed by Jul 10 / 2x projection / ERCOT queue 474 GW ~90% DC / all-time peak ~87,533 MW Jul 21 (verified; ERCOT deck said 91,089) / Abbott Aug 3 comprehensive audit = de facto freeze / M-A080326-01 suspends Aug 7 classification / good-cause exception Aug 20 PUCT / Aug 14 special meeting 250-300 projects under 9 months / EIA cuts TX 2027 growth 14%→6%
Form W Part A closed July 10 as scheduled, and the numbers came back science-fictional: 326 study-eligible projects totaling ~205 GW entered Batch Zero — roughly double the ~100 GW ERCOT had projected. On July 29, CEO Pablo Vegas told the Texas Senate...
PJM board letter Jul 27 / CIFP dead none of 11 concepts 2/3 / backstop auction ER26-3380 $555/MW-day 15-yr / IRAS ER26-3515 filed Aug 13 / new ≥50 MW loads post-Jun-2027 without new capacity curtailed FIRST / excluded from RPM 2029/30 / Large Load Registry / Swett 'grave legitimacy crisis' Sept ultimatum / EL26-67 abeyance / ~70 GW new load by 2038 vs 15 GW retired
The stakeholder process failed first: none of the 11 'Immediate Resource Adequacy Solutions' concepts reached two-thirds support, so on July 27 the Board of Managers (Chair Paula Conboy) simply decided. Four planks. (1) Reliability Backstop Procurement — a...