Plain-English framing: where Wisconsin's tariff change was a regulator (PSC) tightening one utility's rate plan, North Carolina is a state legislature pre-emptively writing the rules for the whole state across every utility — Duke, Dominion-NC, ElectriCities. It is structurally bigger. Three provisions to call out separately because they each create a different kind of project risk. (1) 40 MW threshold is much lower than Wisconsin's 100 MW. NC chose 40 MW because that catches essentially every modern campus, including mid-tier colo. The threshold + a water trigger (1 billion liters/year — roughly the threshold a single mid-size water-cooled facility hits) means almost no real data center escapes it. (2) The 25% on-site clean self-generation mandate is the genuinely novel piece. No other state has a comparable rule. For a 200 MW campus that is 50 MW of solar / wind / battery / geothermal / nuclear-SMR equivalent on-parcel. That is a 50-100 acre solar field or an equivalent BTM combination, and it materially changes the parcel-selection problem (you now need adjacent land big enough for the renewable AND the data hall). (3) The incentives prohibition removes one of the standard tools states use to compete for hyperscale wins (property-tax abatements, sales-tax holidays on equipment). For developers comparing NC vs SC vs VA vs GA, NC just stopped offering financial sweeteners. Sources: WRAL 'Proposed NC bill targets data center costs, power demand'; WRAL NC Capitol 'Getting squeezed: NC lawmakers look to stop data centers from raising energy, water costs'; Data Center Dynamics 'Bill proposed in North Carolina seeks to mandate large load data centers to cover cost of energy and water infrastructure'; WUNC 'NC bill proposes data center regulations, would keep local governments from offering incentives' (May 21); Data Center Knowledge 'North Carolina Targets Hyperscale Costs with Proposed AI Infrastructure Bill'; NC Newsline 'NC bills target data center boom, seeking tax changes, consumer protections' (May 8); Smoky Mountain News 'Data center bill targets rates, water, incentives'.
Primary source · WRAL / WUNC / Data Center Knowledge / Data Center Dynamics ↗
Why it matters
For Cliff this is the most product-relevant single bill of the week because the 25% on-site clean-generation mandate creates an entirely new parcel-selection requirement that doesn't currently exist anywhere else. It also gives an obvious adjacency path for the BTM-economics SKU: every NC site evaluation will need a co-located generation sizing calculation (peak demand × 0.25 → required nameplate solar/wind/storage capacity → required additional acreage → site-fit yes/no). The 40 MW threshold catches more projects than the 100 MW Wisconsin floor, so NC actually becomes the more rigorous filter even though Wisconsin gets the headlines. Two concrete to-dos: (1) Build the 'on-site clean offset' calculation into the parcel evaluator now, against NC's draft text — even pre-passage — so it is live the day the bill is signed. (2) Track which other state legislatures introduce 25%-clean mandates citing NC, because if NC passes and two more states copy in 2026, this becomes the new normal for state-level oversight rather than a single-state quirk. Most likely copiers given political composition + existing renewables build-out: Colorado, Minnesota, Washington, New Mexico, Oregon.
Related filings
Oregon PGE / 100% distribution + 90% take-or-pay + 30-yr term / effective June 10
Plain-English framing. A 'rate class' is the legal bucket a utility puts a customer into to decide what tariff applies — residential, small commercial, large industrial. Oregon just carved out a new bucket exclusively for data-center-scale loads, ring-fenced...
Utility Dive / KPTV / KGW / Oregon PUC ↗
CO HB 1030 / killed 11-2
HB 1030 was Colorado's primary 2026 attempt to attract data-center investment via tax incentives — the bill was first introduced in January and modeled loosely on the sales-and-use exemption regimes that Texas, Virginia, Georgia, Ohio, Iowa, Nebraska, and...
KUNC / CPR News / The Colorado Sun / The Durango Herald ↗
Xcel + Google MN / bilateral template / 750 MW + 1,900 MW CEAC
Plain-English framing. A regulated utility (Xcel) signed a one-off contract with a single very large customer (Google) instead of running the cost-allocation through a new public tariff. In a state with a regulated monopoly utility, every cost the utility...
Xcel Energy Newsroom / Q1 2026 8-K / 24/7 Wall St ↗
WY / Cheyenne / first Mountain West moratorium / 70-project pipeline
Cheyenne is the first city anywhere west of the Mississippi to introduce a data-center moratorium ordinance at the council level in 2026 (the Wisconsin/Michigan/Ohio/Indiana cluster is Midwest; the GA/NC/FL/AL cluster is Sun Belt; Texas has no moratorium tape...
Cowboy State Daily / KGAB / Cap City News / Wyoming News / Casper Star-Tribune ↗