Plain-English framing. Arizona has used a Computer Data Center sales-tax exemption since 2013 to attract hyperscaler builds in the Phoenix metro and Pinal/Maricopa counties; the program currently exempts qualifying equipment purchases from state sales tax. Governor Hobbs (D) asked the legislature to repeal the program outright; the bipartisan budget deal compromised on a 3-year pause for NEW applicants while preserving existing certifications. Why this is a third moratorium model. Build moratoriums (Hood County rescinded; NY S10642 pending) freeze permits. Environmental-review challenges (Pine Island MN) freeze specific projects. The Arizona model freezes the incentive that triggers the build economics in the first place — without prohibiting builds. It's substantively softer than the other two, but politically more durable because the underlying state action (declining to award a tax benefit) is unambiguously within the state's authority. There is no Dillon's Rule attack and no environmental-review challenge available. The revenue math. $57M projected revenue preservation over 3 years implies the state was forgoing ~$19M/year in sales-tax revenue under the existing program — which at typical Arizona sales-tax effective rates of 8-9% implies the program was exempting ~$210-240M of qualifying purchases per year. That is moderate-scale (~2-3 hyperscale builds worth of equipment) and signals the program was already winding toward declining marginal political value.
Primary source · Arizona Capitol Times / CALO News / BGOV ↗
Why it matters
Tax-incentive moratoriums are the model most other states with computer-data-center tax exemptions (TX, VA, WA, OH, IL, GA, MS) will reach for, because they avoid the Dillon's Rule trap and the political fight over construction permits while still constraining hyperscaler economics. For Cliff, this means every state with a CDC tax exemption needs its own incentive-status field in the regulatory knowledge graph: 'active / under review / paused / repealed / expanded.' Texas's Senate Bill 1568 (the CDC equivalent) is up for renewal in the 2027 session — given Abbott's June 10 cost-allocation directive plus this Arizona precedent, the TX exemption is now meaningfully at risk. Mapping CDC-exemption status across all 13 states with active programs is a one-day research task that materially improves Cliff's underwriting accuracy for every site-financing question — worth scoping next week.
Related filings
T-0 Jul 1 2026 / VA $0.011/kWh tax live 12:01 AM SCC collecting / IL DCIP application intake frozen Pritzker fall veto session reform / FL SB 484 live utility cost shift prohibition ≥50 MW full cost of service aquifer permitting tightened / Trump EO 14318 live federal permitting acceleration DC >100 MW or >$500M / IL joins OH AZ ME cluster / VA DEQ water language interim today hard cutover Jan 1 2027 Eastern VA Groundwater Mgmt Area / Data Center Coalition Josh Levi opposed / state-federal misalignment first visible day
Plain-English background. Four separate regulatory clocks all reach 12:01 AM Wednesday July 1, 2026 at the same instant. Three are state-level and point toward friction — they increase cost or reduce access for hyperscalers building in that state. One is...
OpenAI Portsmouth / 10 GW / DOE federal land / SB Energy / NVIDIA credit / state-moratorium bypass
Plain-English framing. The Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (or 'Piketon site') is a Cold War-era uranium-enrichment facility on ~1,200 acres of DOE-owned federal land in southern Ohio. It was decommissioned, and the cleanup created a large, fully-graded...
The Reporting Project (Ohio) / DCD / Network World / Scioto Post ↗
WY / Cheyenne / first Mountain West moratorium / 70-project pipeline
Cheyenne is the first city anywhere west of the Mississippi to introduce a data-center moratorium ordinance at the council level in 2026 (the Wisconsin/Michigan/Ohio/Indiana cluster is Midwest; the GA/NC/FL/AL cluster is Sun Belt; Texas has no moratorium tape...
Cowboy State Daily / KGAB / Cap City News / Wyoming News / Casper Star-Tribune ↗
FERC show cause orders Jun 18 / Section 206 / PJM MISO SPP CAISO ISO-NE NYISO / 30-day informational report Jul 20 / 60-day tariff response Aug 17 / 90-day abeyance request Aug 3 / five reform categories / cost-shift prevention is the big one / colocation + BTMG rules / flexible-load transmission services
Plain-English version. On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC, the federal regulator with jurisdiction over the interstate transmission grid) used Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to issue what are called 'show-cause orders'...