Plain-English version of the geography. North Carolina's data center backlash has concentrated in two adjacent regions: the Charlotte metro (Mecklenburg + Rowan) and the Research Triangle (Durham, Wake, Orange, Chatham). In roughly five weeks, at least nine local governments there have paused or moved to pause data center development. The anchor vote. Charlotte City Council voted unanimously on June 8 for a 150-day moratorium running through November 5. Like most of these, it exempts projects already in the development pipeline — including two data centers in East Charlotte — and tasks city staff with drafting permanent regulations during the pause. The rest of the cluster, by jurisdiction: • Rowan County — one-year moratorium, but explicitly carves out the Edged Energy campus already under development (the same in-flight-project exemption pattern seen in Coweta GA and Boone IN). • Durham (city) — passed a 60-day emergency moratorium in May, now extending it toward a full 12 months. • Durham County — voting on a 12-month pause via a Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) amendment plus the state-required consistency statement. • Holly Springs (Wake County) — one-year pause approved June 16. • Cumberland County / Fayetteville — six-month moratorium, June 15 (covered earlier; Fort Bragg adjacency). • Orange County + Hillsborough — two-month pauses each, passed preemptively (Hillsborough had received no data center proposals). • Chatham County, Apex, Wake County — additional pauses passed across the Triangle. The counter-example inside the cluster. Salisbury (Rowan County) chose a different path: rather than a moratorium, it passed a zoning text amendment that allows data centers but caps maximum size — the 'regulate, don't ban' off-ramp that reappears in today's second section.
Primary source · WFAE (Charlotte's NPR) — Charlotte City Council approves 150-day data center moratorium ↗
Why it matters
Three implications for Cliff. (1) The corpus's RTO-vs-local two-clock framing (from June 20-21) does not apply cleanly to NC, because NC is not in an RTO for most of its territory. For a developer or hyperscaler underwriting a Charlotte, Durham, or Rowan County site, there is no FERC tariff outcome to wait on — the only regulatory clocks that matter are the local moratorium calendar and whatever the NC Utilities Commission and SB 730 produce. That is a categorically different diligence profile from a PJM or MISO site, and the corpus should tag each project's territory as RTO vs. vertically-integrated-utility as a first-class field, because it changes which regulatory body even has jurisdiction over the cost question. (2) The cluster is concentrated enough — nine jurisdictions, two metros, five weeks — that it is almost certainly model-ordinance copying rather than independent local activism, the same signal flagged for Wisconsin. An ordinance-similarity diff across the NC pauses (Charlotte's 150-day staff-drafting template vs. the Triangle's 12-month UDO-amendment template) would tell a developer which lineage their jurisdiction is likely to follow. (3) North Carolina is one of the highest-growth Duke data center markets in the country, which makes it a priority expansion market for Cliff's wedge beyond ERCOT — and the non-RTO structure means the SB 730 retail cost-shift work (the next SKU Cliff has queued behind the live-docket wedge) has its cleanest early test case here, in a state where it is the only game in town.
Related filings
Knox Co TN / 10-0 unanimous (Durrett recused, Xfinity) / EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY / runs through Jun 30 2027 / Commissioner Andy Fox / Mayor Kincannon aligned / TVA territory / charter-county single-vote authority
Plain-English version. Knox County is the eastern Tennessee county containing Knoxville (population ~480,000 in the metro). On June 23, the County Commission voted 10-0 — with Commissioner Courtney Durrett recusing because she works at Xfinity (a Comcast...
WATE 6 Knoxville — Knox County puts new data center projects on hold for 1 year (Jun 23 2026) ↗
FL moratorium wave / Clay final + Hernando, Lake first reading Jun 23 / Santa Rosa 3-1 to draft / Zephyrhills final / 5-8 FL jurisdictions in 5 weeks / SB 484 backdrop / water-first concern
Plain-English version of what happened. Tuesday, June 23 was the single most active moratorium day Florida has had — three county boards moved separate ordinances forward in a coordinated wave. Clay County (just south of Jacksonville, ~220,000 residents) gave...
FERC ANOPR / DOE Section 403 / decision due end of June
Plain-English framing. FERC regulates the interstate transmission grid. Until now, interconnection rules for loads (as opposed to generators) have been overwhelmingly state-level — a developer interconnects through whichever state PUC and utility happens to...
FERC / Utility Dive / Snell & Wilmer / White & Case ↗
Pending verification / 6 items
Pending-item resolution for May 11. Colorado SB 102 (Sen. Cathy Kipp, March 18 introduction): the bill would have banned utility economic agreements incentivizing data centers and required 100% new-renewable sourcing by 2031. Per Colorado Politics ('Despite...
Colorado Politics / CPR / Seehafer News / 9News Denver / WBTV / ERCOT ↗