Plain-English version of what just happened. Virginia is the data center capital of the world. Northern Virginia's Loudoun County alone hosts more data center capacity (~3.5 GW operating, another ~7 GW in the queue) than any other county on earth, and Dominion Energy — the investor-owned utility serving most of NoVa — has roughly half of its total system load going to data centers. The political fight over who pays for the grid build-out has been the dominant Virginia legislative story for two years, with the core dispute being: data centers get a state sales-tax exemption on their IT equipment (estimated at $1.4B-$2B annually), and the cost of new power lines and generation built to serve them has historically been spread across all ratepayers (so residential bills go up to pay for hyperscaler load growth). The 2026 General Assembly session went into special session over this. Three approaches were debated: (1) repeal or narrow the sales-tax exemption (favored by environmental groups, opposed by Dominion + the data center industry + economic-development bureaucrats); (2) make data centers pay for the grid upgrades they cause via a separate rate class at the State Corporation Commission (the SCC already approved this in January 2026 — see prior coverage); (3) introduce a brand-new electricity consumption tax tied directly to kWh consumed. Option 3 is the compromise the budget conferees landed on. It preserves the IT-equipment sales-tax exemption (which is the politically untouchable piece because Dominion + JLARC + Loudoun's economic development office defend it) but adds a new revenue stream tied to actual power consumed. Mechanical details from the budget conference report (HB30, 3-5.24). - **Rate:** $0.011 per kWh of all electricity consumed at each data center in Virginia, charged on a monthly basis. - **Supply source: ALL OF THEM.** The conference language explicitly states the tax applies 'regardless of whether the electricity is provided through an incumbent electric utility, an incumbent electric cooperative, a competitive service provider, or is self-supplied.' This is the critical structural point. A data center cannot escape the tax by building its own on-site gas turbine or signing a behind-the-meter PPA with an SMR developer. Self-supplied power is taxed at the same rate as Dominion-supplied power. That decision was made specifically because the colocation + behind-the-meter generation pattern (Talen-AWS-Susquehanna, Microsoft + Chevron Project Kilby) is now the dominant new-build pattern. - **Revenue cap:** $600M annualized. Any revenue above the cap goes into a special non-reverting fund and is refunded to data center operators pro rata based on their share of tax payments. - **Collection authority:** State Corporation Commission (SCC), not the Virginia Department of Taxation. This is unusual — using the energy regulator to collect a tax — and ties the tax operationally to the SCC's existing rate-design proceedings. - **First return due:** September 2026 (Q3 2026 consumption). - **Sunset:** July 1, 2028. The tax is a 2-year experiment, after which the General Assembly has to re-authorize it. Gov. Spanberger's role and signing posture. Per her June 22 statement: 'This is a compromise proposal — one my administration helped craft — and it builds a strong foundation for further discussions about the future of [the data center] industry in Virginia on issues like environmental and community impact.' She has 7 days from delivery to sign or line-item veto. Expected outcome: clean sign, given her direct involvement in the compromise and her prior public 'I'm not going to break a contract the state has signed' framing of the underlying sales-tax exemption. That means the July 1 effective date is essentially certain to hold.
Why it matters
Four implications. (1) The supply-agnostic structure is the durable innovation. Every prior 'make data centers pay' policy proposal has had a colocation/BTM loophole: build your own gas turbine or sign a self-supply deal and you fall outside the utility rate base, so you escape the new rate class. Virginia just closed that loophole at the state-tax level. The tax follows the consumed kWh, not the contract relationship. This is the structural blueprint other states will copy. Cliff's diligence framework needs to add 'state per-kWh consumption tax exposure' as a new variable for every site, separate from utility rate-class exposure. (2) The $600M cap creates a unique 'pro-rata refund' dynamic that makes the effective rate fall as state-wide data center consumption grows. That's important because it means the political math gets HARDER for industry over time: Virginia residents see $600M in revenue (the cap binds quickly given Loudoun's 3.5 GW alone), and adding more data centers does not raise the cap — it just dilutes each operator's tax bill. So opposition to new builds doesn't have a fiscal counterargument the way it did under the sales-tax-exemption regime. (3) The colocation deals already announced in Virginia (the rumored Microsoft + Dominion behind-the-meter SMR deals, the Talen-AWS-Susquehanna pattern that PJM is currently litigating) all get re-priced by this tax. A self-supplied gigawatt was previously the cleanest way to escape the rate-class fight; it now carries the same $96M/yr tax bill as a grid-supplied gigawatt. The hyperscaler underwriting models for VA need to be re-run with this overlay starting today. (4) The SCC (not Department of Taxation) collection authority is a Cliff-specific signal. The SCC is the same body running the rate-class redesign and the colocation rulemakings. Concentrating tax + rate + interconnection regulation in one agency means the entire data-center-regulatory surface in Virginia is now visible through a single docket system. That's an unusually clean data-acquisition target for the corpus.
Related filings
T-0 Jul 1 2026 / VA $0.011/kWh tax live 12:01 AM SCC collecting / IL DCIP application intake frozen Pritzker fall veto session reform / FL SB 484 live utility cost shift prohibition ≥50 MW full cost of service aquifer permitting tightened / Trump EO 14318 live federal permitting acceleration DC >100 MW or >$500M / IL joins OH AZ ME cluster / VA DEQ water language interim today hard cutover Jan 1 2027 Eastern VA Groundwater Mgmt Area / Data Center Coalition Josh Levi opposed / state-federal misalignment first visible day
Plain-English background. Four separate regulatory clocks all reach 12:01 AM Wednesday July 1, 2026 at the same instant. Three are state-level and point toward friction — they increase cost or reduce access for hyperscalers building in that state. One is...
FERC show cause orders Jun 18 / Section 206 / PJM MISO SPP CAISO ISO-NE NYISO / 30-day informational report Jul 20 / 60-day tariff response Aug 17 / 90-day abeyance request Aug 3 / five reform categories / cost-shift prevention is the big one / colocation + BTMG rules / flexible-load transmission services
Plain-English version. On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC, the federal regulator with jurisdiction over the interstate transmission grid) used Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to issue what are called 'show-cause orders'...
FL moratorium wave / Clay final + Hernando, Lake first reading Jun 23 / Santa Rosa 3-1 to draft / Zephyrhills final / 5-8 FL jurisdictions in 5 weeks / SB 484 backdrop / water-first concern
Plain-English version of what happened. Tuesday, June 23 was the single most active moratorium day Florida has had — three county boards moved separate ordinances forward in a coordinated wave. Clay County (just south of Jacksonville, ~220,000 residents) gave...
NC / HB 1004
WRAL and Data Center Knowledge confirm North Carolina lawmakers have moved HB 1004, the Ratepayer and Resource Protection Act, into the 2025-2026 General Assembly. Filed April 27, 2026. Threshold: facilities with peak electricity demand of ≥40 MW...