Plain-English background. In deregulated wholesale electricity markets, capacity is auctioned three years ahead of when it delivers. PJM (the grid operator for 13 states from Illinois to Virginia covering ~65 million people, the largest electricity market in the world by served population) ran its 2027/2028 auction in July 2025 with clearing prices around 22x the prior year's, sending average residential bills up $10-30/month across the footprint. That $10-30/month pass-through is the political fault line that's now driving state-level data-center policy across the entire PJM region — Virginia's tax, Maryland's moratoriums, New Jersey's rate hearings, Ohio's DCIP freeze, all trace back to auction cost socialization from the 2027/2028 cycle. The 2028/2029 auction (the one for capacity delivered in June 2028 through May 2029) opened Monday June 30, 2026 — yesterday. This is the auction that will price whether the data-center-driven demand surge continues to socialize to residential customers or gets meaningfully shielded. PJM's board went public simultaneously with the auction open, urging all 13 states in the PJM footprint to 'immediately' set up rules that shield residential and existing customers from any auction cost passthrough attributable to data centers. That's an unusual move — RTOs typically stay quiet on state politics because the state PUCs are their regulators. The PJM board publicly telling states 'do this now' is a signal that even the RTO itself thinks the socialization problem is politically unsustainable and needs state-level firewalls before the auction results come out (typical timing: results in September, cost impacts show up on customer bills in June 2028). Mechanically, the states have several tools available: (a) dedicated data-center rate class (Oregon's Schedule 96 template, effective June 10, 2026 with ~29% rate increase for data centers), (b) capacity-payment carve-out (state PUC orders utilities to allocate a fixed percentage of auction cost specifically to data center customers), (c) 'social tariff' models where residential customers get a guaranteed capped rate and everything above is allocated pro-rata to industrial customers. Only Oregon has implemented (a); the others are in various rulemaking stages. PJM's 'immediately' language suggests the board wants at least Virginia, Maryland, Ohio, New Jersey, and Illinois to have some version live before the September auction results. On the parallel Texas track. ERCOT Batch Zero PCLR (Provisional Controllable Load Resource) is the process by which data centers ≥75 MW in ERCOT must classify their load as interruptible (agreeing to be curtailed during system stress in exchange for lower demand charges) or non-interruptible. The classification is a two-step deadline. **Step 1 (July 10, 2026):** the Interconnected Large Load Entity (ILLE — that's the data center operator) must submit a completed, notarized Form W to its serving Interconnecting Transmission Service Provider (TSP) or Distribution Service Provider (DSP). Missing July 10 = dropped from Batch Zero, which means the data center loses the ability to interconnect on the accelerated Batch Zero timeline and falls into the standard queue (which per ERCOT's own trending topic PDF is now ~438,000 MW proposed demand and probably 3-5 years slower). **Step 2 (July 24, 2026):** the TSP/DSP must submit Form W plus supporting modeling data (including per-study-year minimum load projection commitment / LPC limit) to ERCOT. And between those two Texas dates. **July 17, 2026 — Abbott joint memo deadline.** Gov. Abbott issued a June 10, 2026 directive requiring PUCT and ERCOT to submit a joint memo by July 17 that (1) summarizes actions taken under existing authority to shield Texas ratepayers from data center infrastructure cost passthrough, (2) identifies statutory limits on those actions, (3) recommends legislation for the 2027 session. That memo will be the definitive Texas policy document going into next year's legislative session and will be closely read for how far PUCT is willing to go in creating dedicated data center rate structures without new legislation. The PJM 2028/2029 auction, the ERCOT Batch Zero deadlines, and the Abbott memo all resolve in the July 10-July 24 window. That's the entire domestic wholesale-electricity market's data center policy stance being priced simultaneously in about two weeks.
Why it matters
Three implications. (1) The July 10-24 window is now the single most information-dense wholesale-electricity-market window of the year for data centers. PJM's auction opens the day before the two-week window starts; ERCOT's Batch Zero deadlines bracket it on both sides; Abbott's memo sits in the middle. A hyperscaler with sites in both PJM footprint and ERCOT is going to know essentially the entire second-half-of-2026 policy stance by July 25. Cliff should build a live tracker page for these four dates now — Raymond's site diligence output for any project in PJM or ERCOT should reference this specific window as the near-term regulatory clock. (2) PJM's 'immediately' language to states is a lead indicator for OR Schedule 96 replication. Schedule 96 (Oregon PUC Order 26-154, effective June 10) creates a dedicated data center rate class at 20 MW with ~29% average rate increase and 100% distribution-upgrade cost pass-through. That's the template PJM's board is essentially telling states to copy. Watch for Virginia SCC, Maryland PSC, and Ohio PUCO to open Schedule 96-style dockets by end of Q3 2026. Cliff's regulatory corpus should preemptively ingest all state PUC docket filings tagged 'data center rate class' or 'large load' starting now — those will be the compounding-value primary sources. (3) The Abbott TX memo on July 17 is the most consequential 2027-legislative-session-anchoring document Cliff should read the day it drops. Even if Cliff doesn't have a Texas-specific product yet, the memo defines what PUCT can do without new legislation vs. what needs legislative authorization — that maps directly to which policy tools are 12-month-actionable vs. 30-month-actionable in Texas. And Texas is where ERCOT queue growth is most concentrated (438 GW proposed demand, ~90% data centers per ERCOT's own trending topic PDF). Cliff should plan to publish a same-day analysis of the memo when it drops.
Tags
Related filings
T-7 ERCOT ILLE Form W Jul 10 / T-21 Form W step 2 Jul 24 / PJM 2028-29 auction closes Jul 7 / results Jul 14 / price band $175-325 MW-day / 13-state governor pre-negotiated band / MD FERC ratepayer complaint comment deadline Jul 27 extended / NY A11560 not delivered to Hochul / 10-day clock not started / passive enactment plausible / 4 deadline-anchored windows next 24 days
Plain-English background on why the four operational-track deadlines all matter this month. Each of these deadlines drives a specific action by developers, hyperscalers, or state parties, and each represents a concrete moment where Cliff can produce a...
Oracle sued Wisconsin PSC Jun 19 Ozaukee County / challenging April tariff rule / $100M/year financial security / very large customer >20 MW sub-A credit / Oracle BBB / Port Washington $15B 672 acres 1 GW 4 buildings We Energies / statutory-authority + discrimination + due-process theories / parallel administrative reconsideration / first hyperscaler-vs-PSC ratepayer-protection lawsuit / template for VA SCC MD FERC IL DCIP TX SB6 / AWS BBB+ adjacent risk / expected 6-12 months to ruling
Plain-English background on why this lawsuit matters more than a single facility dispute. Multiple states have enacted or are enacting 'ratepayer protection' rules for hyperscaler-scale customers in 2025-2026: Virginia's SCC rate class (approved Nov 2025,...
T+3 PJM bid close Jul 7 / T+3 Lakeland FL first reading Jul 6 9AM / T-6 ERCOT Form W Jul 10 / T+11 PJM auction results Jul 14 / T+16 Lakeland FL final vote Jul 20 / T+23 MD FERC comment deadline Jul 27 / Prince George's MD 2-year moratorium vote queued next week / NY A11560 not delivered to Hochul / 10-day clock not started / 6 deadline windows 24 days
Plain-English rollup of what didn't change over the July 4 weekend and what's coming next week. **ERCOT Batch Zero Form W Part A — T-6 to Thursday July 10.** No change since Thursday. The Interconnecting Large Load Entity (data center operator) must...
T-0 Jul 1 2026 / VA $0.011/kWh tax live 12:01 AM SCC collecting / IL DCIP application intake frozen Pritzker fall veto session reform / FL SB 484 live utility cost shift prohibition ≥50 MW full cost of service aquifer permitting tightened / Trump EO 14318 live federal permitting acceleration DC >100 MW or >$500M / IL joins OH AZ ME cluster / VA DEQ water language interim today hard cutover Jan 1 2027 Eastern VA Groundwater Mgmt Area / Data Center Coalition Josh Levi opposed / state-federal misalignment first visible day
Plain-English background. Four separate regulatory clocks all reach 12:01 AM Wednesday July 1, 2026 at the same instant. Three are state-level and point toward friction — they increase cost or reduce access for hyperscalers building in that state. One is...