Google will spend $1.5 billion through 2027 expanding the data center it has operated in Jackson County since 2018 (cumulative investment now over $2 billion), creating 1,000+ construction jobs. The campus sits on the site of TVA's retired Widows Creek coal plant — a brownfield-to-data-center conversion that reuses existing transmission interconnection. The headline commitment is the one that matters for the regulatory fight: Google says it will pay for 100% of the power it consumes, so the cost does not fall on other TVA ratepayers. It paired that with a $2 million 'Energy Impact Fund' (with TVA and a local agency) for energy-efficiency and weatherization programs, and $550K in STEM kits for local students. This lands the same week as Governor Abbott's directive ordering PUCT/ERCOT to make data centers pay their own infrastructure costs (July 17 memo), New York's pending moratorium-plus-ratepayer-protection bill, and Oklahoma's Data Center Ratepayer Protection Act — all of which try to legally force exactly what Google just volunteered.
Primary source · Alabama Daily News ↗
Why it matters
This is the template the best-capitalized developers will copy to clear the ratepayer-protection wall, and it gives Cliff a concrete underwriting checklist. The winning concessions are becoming legible: (1) contractual commitment to cover 100% of incremental power cost; (2) a community benefits / energy-efficiency fund; (3) brownfield/retired-plant siting that reuses existing transmission instead of demanding new buildout. A site-readiness platform should score each prospective site against this emerging 'approvable package' — does it have a retired plant with live interconnection? can the offtake be structured so the developer absorbs the grid cost? — because that package, not raw megawatts, is what now predicts approval in ratepayer-protection states. Tracking which commitments actually cleared which jurisdictions is precisely the approval-outcomes corpus Cliff is built to compound.
Related filings
Oklahoma
The Data Center Consumer Ratepayer Protection Act of 2026 cleared the OK Senate unanimously and now returns to the House. Bill defines 'large load customers' as new facilities ≥75 MW grid demand; requires those customers cover their share of electricity +...
FERC show cause orders Jun 18 / Section 206 / PJM MISO SPP CAISO ISO-NE NYISO / 30-day informational report Jul 20 / 60-day tariff response Aug 17 / 90-day abeyance request Aug 3 / five reform categories / cost-shift prevention is the big one / colocation + BTMG rules / flexible-load transmission services
Plain-English version. On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC, the federal regulator with jurisdiction over the interstate transmission grid) used Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to issue what are called 'show-cause orders'...
Project Kilby / Microsoft + Chevron 2.67 GW behind-the-meter / Pecos TX Permian Basin / 20-yr PPA / $7B+ capex / FID YE 2026 / first power 2028 / OFF-grid (bypasses ERCOT)
Plain-English version of what Project Kilby is. Microsoft and Chevron jointly announced on June 22 that they are co-developing a roughly 2.67 gigawatt natural gas power plant in the Permian Basin near Pecos, Texas (about 200 miles east of El Paso), paired...
NC / HB 1004
WRAL and Data Center Knowledge confirm North Carolina lawmakers have moved HB 1004, the Ratepayer and Resource Protection Act, into the 2025-2026 General Assembly. Filed April 27, 2026. Threshold: facilities with peak electricity demand of ≥40 MW...