Plain-English context. ERCOT (Electric Reliability Council of Texas — the grid operator for ~90% of Texas load) is the only major U.S. grid operator that is NOT subject to FERC's interstate jurisdiction, because Texas runs its grid as an intrastate island. That means the six show-cause orders FERC issued yesterday do not touch ERCOT. ERCOT is on its own parallel timeline driven by the Texas Public Utility Commission (PUCT). The current vetting regime for large loads (anything 75 MW or larger — which captures every serious data center) is the Large Load Interconnection Study (LLIS), processed one project at a time. That regime sunsets July 10, 2026. After that date, the only way for a new >75 MW load to be studied in ERCOT is the new Batch Zero process — projects are queued, vetted, and approved in batches rather than individually. The Texas Tribune confirmed on June 17 that PUCT is 'close to approving' the Batch Zero design. The operational pinch point is the dynamic generator model submission window: any project that wants to be in the first Batch Zero cohort has to file its model by July 10. Miss the window and the project waits for the next batch, which means months of additional pre-approval time. The Abbott directive of June 10 added two more Texas-specific deadlines that hit in the same window: July 17, 2026 for a joint PUCT+ERCOT memo to the Governor on actions taken under SB 6 (the 2025 law that requires upfront financial commitments from large loads), and July 31, 2026 for PUCT action to cut residential transmission costs.
Primary source · Texas Tribune — June 17, 2026 confirmation of Batch Zero approval imminence ↗
Why it matters
Two implications for site-readiness work. (1) Every Texas site in pre-approval right now has a binary deadline three weeks out — file the dynamic generator model by July 10 or land in a later batch. That is the kind of single-date trigger a regulatory graph should be surfacing on every Texas parcel record, automatically, today. (2) Because ERCOT is the only large-load regime that does not depend on yesterday's FERC outcome, it is the one place a developer can still get to a definite answer this summer. Sites that need certainty (capital deployment timing, hyperscaler contract closing) are going to migrate disproportionately toward Texas over the next 90 days as a hedge against the federal uncertainty FERC just introduced for the other five RTOs — which is worth watching as a leading indicator in the queue data.
Related filings
T+3 PJM bid close Jul 7 / T+3 Lakeland FL first reading Jul 6 9AM / T-6 ERCOT Form W Jul 10 / T+11 PJM auction results Jul 14 / T+16 Lakeland FL final vote Jul 20 / T+23 MD FERC comment deadline Jul 27 / Prince George's MD 2-year moratorium vote queued next week / NY A11560 not delivered to Hochul / 10-day clock not started / 6 deadline windows 24 days
Plain-English rollup of what didn't change over the July 4 weekend and what's coming next week. **ERCOT Batch Zero Form W Part A — T-6 to Thursday July 10.** No change since Thursday. The Interconnecting Large Load Entity (data center operator) must...
Oracle sued Wisconsin PSC Jun 19 Ozaukee County / challenging April tariff rule / $100M/year financial security / very large customer >20 MW sub-A credit / Oracle BBB / Port Washington $15B 672 acres 1 GW 4 buildings We Energies / statutory-authority + discrimination + due-process theories / parallel administrative reconsideration / first hyperscaler-vs-PSC ratepayer-protection lawsuit / template for VA SCC MD FERC IL DCIP TX SB6 / AWS BBB+ adjacent risk / expected 6-12 months to ruling
Plain-English background on why this lawsuit matters more than a single facility dispute. Multiple states have enacted or are enacting 'ratepayer protection' rules for hyperscaler-scale customers in 2025-2026: Virginia's SCC rate class (approved Nov 2025,...
T-7 ERCOT ILLE Form W Jul 10 / T-21 Form W step 2 Jul 24 / PJM 2028-29 auction closes Jul 7 / results Jul 14 / price band $175-325 MW-day / 13-state governor pre-negotiated band / MD FERC ratepayer complaint comment deadline Jul 27 extended / NY A11560 not delivered to Hochul / 10-day clock not started / passive enactment plausible / 4 deadline-anchored windows next 24 days
Plain-English background on why the four operational-track deadlines all matter this month. Each of these deadlines drives a specific action by developers, hyperscalers, or state parties, and each represents a concrete moment where Cliff can produce a...
ERCOT Batch Zero / 438000 MW queue / 90% data centers / 395000 MW DC load / July 10 Form W Part A deadline / July 24 ILLE to ERCOT / Aug classification cleared conditional further-study / Fall 2027 final transmission plan / PCLR optional accelerator / vs ERCOT 85000 MW system peak / 4.7x current system load
Plain-English version. Yesterday's edition framed July 10 as the ERCOT Batch Zero application deadline for large loads (≥75 MW). Today we have the actual scale number, which ERCOT's June 18 'Trending Topic: New Batch Connection Process for Large Electricity...