Plain-English framing: ERCOT runs the Texas grid. The waitlist for new very-large electric loads (mostly data centers and crypto) is over 230 GW — more than the entire current ERCOT system peak. Batch Zero is a one-time amnesty-style process to clear that backlog under shared rules, instead of making every project wait years. The centerpiece — the Provisional Controllable Load Resource (PCLR) — lets a data center connect early in exchange for agreeing that ERCOT can curtail it in real time down to its 'minimum firm load' until the transmission upgrades that would let it run full-out are built. It is the load-side mirror of how curtailable generation already plugs in. The May 13 TAC meeting was the last serious chance for material amendments. The ERCOT comments filed May 11 — on MW allocation methodology and studied-load treatment — are the ones to read carefully because they determine how Batch Zero slots get rationed between projects if applications exceed available headroom. The June 1 Board vote is procedurally a rubber stamp; the rules are effectively final now. The operative date for developers is July 24 — the Declaration of Intent deadline. Miss it and the project drops to the ordinary queue. Sources: EPE Consulting 'New Pathway and Deadlines in ERCOT's Batch Zero: PCLR'; Zero Emission Grid 'ERCOT TAC May 2026: PGRR145 Batch Zero Updates'; ERCOT 'PUBLIC Item 9.1: Batch Study Update Jeff Billo' (April 13 board packet); RTO Insider 'ERCOT's TAC Nears End of Batch Zero Discussion'; Seyfarth Shaw 'ERCOT's Batch Zero Proposal and What It Means for Large-Load Projects in Texas'; ERCOT market notices M-A122325-05 and M-A301326-01; cross-reference with strategy/ercot-pclr-batch-zero-timeline.md.
Primary source · EPE Consulting / Zero Emission Grid / ERCOT / RTO Insider / Seyfarth Shaw ↗
Why it matters
Nine weeks remain until July 24. This is the only live deadline in U.S. data-center site readiness where the structured filing that developers must produce (Form W Part A + modeling data including the per-study-year minimum firm-load limit) is also exactly the dataset Cliff's approval-outcomes corpus needs to capture. Two product implications: (1) Before June 1, the public ERCOT docket should be re-scraped to confirm the May 13 TAC vote text and any last-second amendments to the MW allocation / studied-load treatment language. Even one tweak there changes how a developer should size and time their Declaration of Intent. (2) The July 24 cutover is the natural cutoff for a 'Batch Zero filing assistant' surface: ingest a developer's project spec (location, peak MW, ramp curve, expected minimum firm load), produce a draft Form W Part A and modeling-data package, flag missing inputs. The same surface re-positions cleanly as the PCLR contract-negotiation aid post-July-24 for projects that won a slot. Pair with the PUCT financial-security rule (16 TAC §25.194, $50k/MW non-refundable) so the developer sees the ERCOT timing gate AND the PUCT cost gate in one underwriting view.
Related filings
T+3 PJM bid close Jul 7 / T+3 Lakeland FL first reading Jul 6 9AM / T-6 ERCOT Form W Jul 10 / T+11 PJM auction results Jul 14 / T+16 Lakeland FL final vote Jul 20 / T+23 MD FERC comment deadline Jul 27 / Prince George's MD 2-year moratorium vote queued next week / NY A11560 not delivered to Hochul / 10-day clock not started / 6 deadline windows 24 days
Plain-English rollup of what didn't change over the July 4 weekend and what's coming next week. **ERCOT Batch Zero Form W Part A — T-6 to Thursday July 10.** No change since Thursday. The Interconnecting Large Load Entity (data center operator) must...
Oracle sued Wisconsin PSC Jun 19 Ozaukee County / challenging April tariff rule / $100M/year financial security / very large customer >20 MW sub-A credit / Oracle BBB / Port Washington $15B 672 acres 1 GW 4 buildings We Energies / statutory-authority + discrimination + due-process theories / parallel administrative reconsideration / first hyperscaler-vs-PSC ratepayer-protection lawsuit / template for VA SCC MD FERC IL DCIP TX SB6 / AWS BBB+ adjacent risk / expected 6-12 months to ruling
Plain-English background on why this lawsuit matters more than a single facility dispute. Multiple states have enacted or are enacting 'ratepayer protection' rules for hyperscaler-scale customers in 2025-2026: Virginia's SCC rate class (approved Nov 2025,...
T-7 ERCOT ILLE Form W Jul 10 / T-21 Form W step 2 Jul 24 / PJM 2028-29 auction closes Jul 7 / results Jul 14 / price band $175-325 MW-day / 13-state governor pre-negotiated band / MD FERC ratepayer complaint comment deadline Jul 27 extended / NY A11560 not delivered to Hochul / 10-day clock not started / passive enactment plausible / 4 deadline-anchored windows next 24 days
Plain-English background on why the four operational-track deadlines all matter this month. Each of these deadlines drives a specific action by developers, hyperscalers, or state parties, and each represents a concrete moment where Cliff can produce a...
T-8 to Jul 10 ERCOT ILLE Form W deadline / Form W Part A now posted Large Load Integration page / notarized to TSP DSP / miss = 438000 MW proposed queue 89% data centers 3-5 years slower / Jul 24 TSP DSP to ERCOT step 2 / Microsoft Fairwater Mount Pleasant WI fully operational Jun 23 / 3.3B first phase / Brad Smith world's most powerful supercomputer / MISO not PJM / low friction state routing / 550 FTE 10000 construction workers / capex not slowing on T+0 morning / state-vs-federal misalignment produces geographic sorting
Plain-English background on the operational track. Yesterday's newsletter covered the regulatory calendar (VA tax, IL DCIP freeze, FL SB 484, Trump EO 14318, PJM auction open, ERCOT Batch Zero deadlines, Abbott Texas memo). Today's operational read is about...